Thomas Lee

Badge #23260, Asian Male
Police Officer at 24th Precinct since January 2011
Service started July 2008, made $162,000 last year, Tax #947169

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-24800
Closed: 3/7/2022
Case: 1 Allegation

View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
4 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Complainant Uncooperative

Complaint #202511220, October 2025
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202002217, March 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, March 20, 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Trial Decision
additional details

Complaint #202511220, October 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 21-24 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202002217, March 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, March 20, 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Trial Decision
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-24800
Closed: 3/7/2022
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: -
Penalty: Vacation days (3 days)

Case Details:
  1. Failed to timely activate their body worn camera.
Recommendation: Other


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Shirley, Benjamin vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 23CV09696, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, November 14, 2023, ended April 8, 2024
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On March 8, 2020, around midnight, Plaintiff, a Black dentist, was lawfully present at the premises of the dental office he owned. Plaintiff exited the office to discard the office’s trash in the building’s designated area and reentered his office using his keys. Defendant officers Thomas Lee and Eugene Choi observed this and without justification, reasonable suspicion, or probable cause, began shining their flashlights inside the window and onto Plaintiff’s face, temporarily blinding and disorienting him. Defendant officers accessed the building’s intercom system and demanded Plaintiff exit the premises and show identification. Plaintiff called 911 and the dispatcher talked down to him then disconnected him. T...

Shirley, Benjamin vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 154769/2021, Supreme Court - New York, May 26, 2021
Complaint
Description: On May 14, 2018, dentist Plaintiff was on the sidewalk abutting his place of work when POs Fitzgerald and Celenza approached, stopped, questioned, and detained him without justification. The POs lied about the reason for the stop, and when they saw that Plaintiff was videotaping the encounter, PO Celenza covered his badge and shined his flashlight in Plaintiff's face. During the encounter, the POs repeatedly refused to identify themselves and repeatedly laughed at Plaintiff. When the POs left the scene, they nearly struck Plaintiff with their vehicle. Two years, later, starting on the evening of March 8, 2020, Plaintiff exited his place of work to take out the trash. After POs Lee and Choi observed him reente...

Other Documents