Mark F. Domanick

Badge #1611, White Male
Detective Grade 3 at Narcotics Borough Queens North since August 2020
Also served at 109th Precinct, Gang Squad Queens North
Service started July 2006, made $182,000 last year, Tax #941669

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched

Complaints

4 Complaints
13 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Complainant Uncooperative
4 Complaint Withdrawn
1 Unable to Determine
3 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202401820, February 2024
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #201800115, December 2017
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Male, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Male, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Male, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Male, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #201604952, June 2016
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 49
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Demeanor/tone
Complainant: White Male, 49
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: White Male, 49
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201114234, November 2011
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202401820, February 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 45-49 Unable to Determine
Force: Gun Pointed Black Male, 45-49 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched Black Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #201800115, December 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Male, 42 Complaint Withdrawn
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Male, 42 Complaint Withdrawn
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Male, 42 Complaint Withdrawn
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Male, 42 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #201604952, June 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Unfounded
Force: Physical force White Male, 49 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Demeanor/tone White Male, 49 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged White Male, 49 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #201114234, November 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Complainant Uncooperative
Force: Physical force White Male Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Johnson, Jermel vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 701807/2026, Supreme Court - Queens, January 22, 2026

Other Documents