Andrew L. Simpson

Badge #4033, Black Male
Sergeant at 19th Precinct since September 2024
Also served at US Open Tennis Detail, Field Training Unit, 40th Precinct
Service started April 2018, made $164,000 last year, Tax #965869

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Stop (2)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2021-24354
Closed: 1/15/2022

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$9,000   Campusano, Gladys vs City of Ny, et al., 2021 BCSC BCSC 805270/2021E
View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
10 Allegations
2 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Complainant Unavailable
2 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
2 SRAD Closure
1 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202504441, April 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202503268, April 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
additional details

Complaint #202311190, November 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #201910281, November 2019
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201904383, May 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202504441, April 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 15-17 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202503268, April 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Male, 30-34 SRAD Closure
Discourtesy: Action Male, 30-34 SRAD Closure
additional details
Complaint #202311190, November 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #201910281, November 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 45-49 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Female, 15-17 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Force: Physical force Female Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Stop Female Substantiated (Formalized Training)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201904383, May 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Hispanic Male, 22 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Hispanic Male, 22 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2021-24354
Closed: 1/15/2022
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully stopped an individual known to the Department.
  2. Wrongfully stopped individuals.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Campusano, Gladys vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 805270/2021E, Supreme Court - Bronx, May 11, 2021, ended December 20, 2023
$9,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On December 1, 2019, while lawfully at 325 East 149th Street in Bronx, NY, the plaintiff was unlawfully approached, questioned, and arrested by defendants, including Lamik Fitzgerald, Andrew Simpson, and John Does #1-8, without legal justification. The plaintiff had received permission from her stepfather to use his car to pick up food from a nearby restaurant. After legally parking and picking up the food, she returned to find she had locked the keys in the car. She called her boyfriend, Patrick Tillay, for help, and he, along with a friend, used a hanger to lower the window and retrieve the keys. Defendants approached and questioned their method of entry. Despite explaining the situation and offering document...

Other Documents