Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Taimur I. Raja
Badge #19639,
Asian Male
Police Officer at 70th Precinct since July 2016
Service
started July 2012,
made $163,000 last year,
Tax #953289
Complaints
3
Complaints
6
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1
Complainant Unavailable
1
Exonerated
3
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202502233,
March 2025
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Female, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Stop |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #201703481,
January 2017
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
Complaint #201507639,
September 2015
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 31 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Unavailable |
| Complaint #202502233, March 2025 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | Female, 50-54 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Stop | Black Female, 50-54 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Black Female, 50-54 | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Black Female, 50-54 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201703481, January 2017 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 49 | Exonerated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201507639, September 2015 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | White Male, 31 | Complainant Unavailable |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2015-14584
Closed: 5/16/2016
Case Details:
- Guilty: Consumed an intoxicant to the extent that he was unfit for duty.
- Guilty: Operated a motor vehicle while his ability was impaired by alcohol.
- Guilty: Refused to submit to a breathalyzer test.
- Guilty: While off-duty, operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant.
Penalty: Counseling, dismissal probation (12 months), ordered breath testing, pre-trial suspension days (34 days), vacation days (6 days)
Lawsuits
Named in 2 known lawsuits.Walker, Michael Tracy vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 17CV05202, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, September 26, 2017
Complaint
Description: While defendant was handcuffed, face down in the street, Defendant Officers repeatedly punched him in the face and assaulted him.
Estrada, Maynor vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 14CV05036, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, September 4, 2014, ended June 2, 2016
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On January 6, 2011, plaintiff left his work and got into his vehicle. He was stopped by officers, who removed plaintiff's cell phone from his hands upon plaintiff saying that he "did not speak much english." Plaintiff was asked by defendant officers what the pills in his car were, to which plaintiff responded that it was diabetes medication. Plaintiff was unlawfully detained and taken to the precinct. All charges against plaintiff were eventually dismissed.