Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 4 known lawsuits, $42,001 total settlements.
Catala, Steven Gonzalez vs Allicott, John Doe
Case # 25CV02298,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, June 10, 2026
Guerrero-Tabares, Mateo vs The City of Ny, et al.
Case # 24CV06361,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, October 1, 2024, ended November 13, 2025
$29,501 Settlement
Rivera, Diane vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV06105,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, October 30, 2015, ended August 9, 2016
$12,500 Settlement
Amended Complaint,
Complaint,
Original Complaint
Description: Defendant officers went to Plaintiff's home, told her that her son was not supposed to be there due to an order of protection that was actually closed. The officers did not have a warrant and there was no complaining witness. Plaintiff was arrested, taken to the 71st precinct, and her case was later dismissed.
City of New York vs Allicott, Khaleef
Case # 014415/2008,
Supreme Court - Kings, May 20, 2008, ended September 16, 2014
Order/Judgment (Verdict)
