Enrico J. Lauretta

Badge #19993, White Male
Police Officer at 84th Precinct since October 2024
Also served at 114th Precinct, Police Service Area 2 VIPER
Service started July 2015, made $135,000 last year, Tax #958799

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Pepper spray
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) (4)
Discourtesy: Action
Discourtesy: Word (4)
Offensive Language: Other (2)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-29222
Closed: 5/8/2024
Case: 2023-29421
Closed: 5/8/2024
Closed: 1/30/2024
Case: 6 Charges

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$50,000   Singh, Inderjit vs Police Dept, Nyc., et al., 2023 QCSC QCSC 702492/2023
$10,000   Lugo, Irving vs City of New York, et al., 2019 QCSC QCSC 718469/2019
View Details

Articles

2020 NYC Protests, CCRB, 1/24/2023
Police Watchdog Recommends Discipline for 39 NYPD Officers Over "Substantiated Misconduct" At BLM Protests, Gothamist, 6/22/2021
NYPD Officer Who Appeared To Use White Power Gesture At BLM Protest Has Finally Been Identified, Gothamist, 3/9/2021

Complaints

5 Complaints
25 Allegations
17 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
7 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
7 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
4 Unable to Determine
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202205724, August 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Asian Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Asian Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Asian Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
Complainant: Asian Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Asian Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Asian Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Asian Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Asian Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Asian Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Asian Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal)
Complainant: Asian Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Asian Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Asian Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Asian Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Asian Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Asian Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Asian Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Asian Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Previously adjudicated, discipline not reported
APU Case Status: Closed: Previously adjudicated, discipline not reported, January 28, 2026
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202205982, August 2022
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Previously adjudicated, discipline not reported
APU Case Status: Closed: Previously adjudicated, discipline not reported, January 28, 2026
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202003697, May 2020
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
Complainant: Asian Male, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202300653, December 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race)
Complainant: Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Black Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
Complainant: Black Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #201702337, March 2017
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202205724, August 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Asian Male, 55-59 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Asian Male, 55-59 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Asian Male, 55-59 Substantiated (Charges)
Offensive Language: Other Asian Male, 55-59 Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Word Asian Male, 55-59 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Discourtesy: Action Asian Male, 55-59 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Discourtesy: Word Asian Male, 55-59 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Asian Male, 55-59 Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Word Asian Male, 55-59 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Asian Male, 55-59 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal) Asian Male, 55-59 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Physical force Asian Male, 55-59 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Physical force Asian Male, 55-59 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Asian Male, 55-59 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Asian Male, 55-59 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Asian Male, 55-59 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Asian Male, 55-59 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Asian Male, 55-59 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Previously adjudicated, discipline not reported
APU Case Status: Closed: Previously adjudicated, discipline not reported, January 28, 2026
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202205982, August 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Pepper spray Hispanic Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Previously adjudicated, discipline not reported
APU Case Status: Closed: Previously adjudicated, discipline not reported, January 28, 2026
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202003697, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Other Asian Male, 39 Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202300653, December 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) Male, 15-17 Unable to Determine
Force: Chokehold Black Male, 15-17 Unable to Determine
Offensive Language: Race Black Male, 15-17 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 15-17 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #201702337, March 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25 Complainant Uncooperative
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-29222
Closed: 5/8/2024
Case Details:
  1. Made inappropriate comments.
  2. Wrongful threat of force.
  3. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
  4. Violated patrol rules.
  5. Wrongful threat of force
  6. Wrongfully frisked an individual known to the Department.
  7. Wrongfully searched an individual known to the Department.
  8. Wrongfully used offensive language.
  9. Wrongfully used physical force.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications

Case: 2023-29421
Closed: 5/8/2024
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully used physical force.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications

Closed: 1/30/2024
Case Details:
  1. Pleaded Guilty: Wrongfully used physical force.
  2. Pleaded Guilty: Failed to make proper notifications. Failed to make required entries in Department logs..
  3. Pleaded Guilty: Wrongfully used physical force
  4. Pleaded Guilty: Wrongfully discourteous to a person known to the Department.
  5. Pleaded Guilty: Wrongfully frisked a person known to the Department. Wrongfully search a person known to the Department. violated patrol rules..
  6. Pleaded Guilty: Failed to make proper notifications. Failed to make required entries in Department logs. failed to activate body-worn camera..
Penalty: Dismissal probation (12 months), suspended w/o pay (30 days), vacation days (40 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $60,000 total settlements.

Singh, Inderjit vs Police Dept, Nyc., et al.
Case # 702492/2023, Supreme Court - Queens, February 2, 2023, ended November 17, 2025
$50,000 Settlement

Lugo, Irving vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 718469/2019, Supreme Court - Queens, November 18, 2019, ended May 22, 2025
$10,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On April 4, 2019, plaintiff was lawfully present in the street, when defendant POs Lauretta and Does arrested plaintiff without an arrest warrant or any probable cause. Defendant POs then filed erroneous police reports to initiate the prosecution of plaintiff.