Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Case: 2017-17658
Closed: 7/10/2017
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
While in the rank of Lieutenant wrongfully submitted a letter or had a letter submitted on his behalf requesting an accommodation for the Captain's promotion exam to the New York City Department of city wide administrative services (dcas), which Lieutenant othman knew contained a false statement or false information, and knowing that it will be filed with, registered or recorded in or otherwise become a part of the records of dcas.
-
Guilty:
While in the rank of Police Officer wrongfully submitted a letter or had a letter submitted on his behalf requesting an accommodation for the Sergeant's promotion exam to the New York City Department of city wide administrative services (dcas), which Police Officer othman knew contained a false statement or false information, and knowing that it will be filed with, registered or recorded in or otherwise become a part of the records of dcas.
-
Guilty:
While in the rank of Sergeant wrongfully submitted a letter or had a letter submitted on his behalf requesting an accommodation for the Lieutenant's promotion exam to the New York City Department of city wide administrative services (dcas), which Sergeant othman knew contained a false statement or false information, and knowing that it will be filed with, registered or recorded in or otherwise become a part of the records of dcas.
Penalty: Dismissal probation (12 months), suspended w/o pay (30 days), vacation days (30 days)
Case: 2014-11577
Closed: 4/10/2014
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
While on-duty, did fail and neglect to make required entries in his activity log.
-
Guilty:
While on-duty, failed to supervise.
-
Guilty:
While on-duty, was absent from his assigned post without permission or police necessity.
Penalty: Vacation days (13 days)
Named in 4 known lawsuits, $60,000 total settlements.
Lee, Claudia Marie vs Town of Wawayanda Et. al.
Case # 23CV07064,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, September 26, 2023, ended January 14, 2026
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Justiniano, Jonathan vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 158997/2023,
Supreme Court - New York, September 19, 2023
Complaint
Description: On September 30, 2022, at approximately 6:30 p.m., Plaintiff was riding his moped headed towards his home from a friend’s house when he observed a vehicle traveling closely to him and moved to the far right lane to avoid a collision unbeknownst to the Plaintiff the vehicle was an unmarked police vehicle. Defendant PO Ismael Arriaza, Rolando Llovera, Lieutenant Ahmed Othman and John Does never employed any lights or sirens to indicate that they were officers or that they wanted Plaintiff’s attention. Defendants struck Plaintiff from behind by their vehicle, expelling him from his scooter and causing severe injuries. While Plaintiff was on the ground in excruciating pain and barely conscious, approximately 5 def...
Lopez, Georgia vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 12CV04694,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, November 13, 2012, ended June 25, 2013
$15,000 Settlement
Seda, Daniel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 12CV04628,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, September 25, 2012, ended November 19, 2013
$45,000 Settlement
Bailey, David 2012.pdf