Complaint #200002003, January 2000

Incident: January 29, 2000
Received: March 29, 2000
Closed: March 30, 2001

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 44th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - resisting arrest

Witness Officers: Angel Bones, Raymond Engen, Donald Pirone

Officer:	Pappas, Billy
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 45
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Pappas, Billy
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 45
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Pappas, Billy
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 45
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Oconnell, James
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 45
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 45-49
Allegation:	Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Urena, Augusto
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 45
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Mccormack, Timothy
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 45
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Pappas, Billy	Hispanic Male, 45	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Pappas, Billy	Hispanic Male, 45	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unsubstantiated
Pappas, Billy	Hispanic Male, 45	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Oconnell, James	Hispanic Male, 45	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Unknown Officer	Hispanic Male, 45-49	Force: Hit against inanimate object	Unsubstantiated
Urena, Augusto	Hispanic Male, 45	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Mccormack, Timothy	Hispanic Male, 45	Force: Physical force	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.