Complaint #200302413,
April 2, 2003

Officer: Alexander, James
Complainant: Black Male, 18
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Unfounded
CCRB Board Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Alexander, James
Complainant: Black Male, 18
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Unfounded
CCRB Board Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Alexander, James
Complainant: Black Male, 18
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Unfounded
CCRB Board Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Armistead, Anthony
Complainant: Black Male, 18
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Miscellaneous - Subject Terminated
Officer: Dauge, Vincent
Complainant: Black Male, 18
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Dauge, Vincent
Complainant: Black Male, 18
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Board Conclusion
Alexander, James Black Male, 18 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Unfounded
Alexander, James Black Male, 18 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Unsubstantiated
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Unfounded
Alexander, James Black Male, 18 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Unsubstantiated
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Unfounded
Armistead, Anthony Black Male, 18 Discourtesy: Word Miscellaneous - Subject Terminated
Dauge, Vincent Black Male, 18 Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search Unfounded
Dauge, Vincent Black Male, 18 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Unfounded
Unknown Officer Black Male, 18-20 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Officer(s) Unidentified

Conclusion Meanings:

'Officer(s) Unidentified': Unable to identify the officers who committed the alleged misconduct
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Details

Incident: April 2, 2003
Closed: July 7, 2005

Reason for contact: Other
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 75th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Christophe Connell, Brent Robson, Richard Sapienza