Complaint #200303409, May 2003

Incident: May 8, 2003
Received: May 9, 2003
Closed: May 19, 2004

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 43rd Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - resisting arrest

Witness Officers: Christophe Vonkessel

Officer:	Collura, Joseph
Complainant:	Black Male, 41
Allegation:	Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Collura, Joseph
Complainant:	Black Male, 41
Allegation:	Offensive Language: Race
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Collura, Joseph
Complainant:	Black Male, 41
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Eiseman, William
Complainant:	Black Male, 41
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Eiseman, William
Complainant:	Black Male, 41
Allegation:	Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Eiseman, William
Complainant:	Black Male, 41
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Collura, Joseph
Complainant:	Black Male, 41
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Collura, Joseph	Black Male, 41	Force: Gun Pointed	Exonerated
Collura, Joseph	Black Male, 41	Offensive Language: Race	Unfounded
Collura, Joseph	Black Male, 41	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unsubstantiated
Eiseman, William	Black Male, 41	Discourtesy: Word	Unfounded
Eiseman, William	Black Male, 41	Force: Gun Pointed	Exonerated
Eiseman, William	Black Male, 41	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unsubstantiated
Collura, Joseph	Black Male, 41	Discourtesy: Word	Unfounded

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.