Complaint #200304708, June 2003

Incident: June 8, 2003
Received: June 20, 2003
Closed: March 29, 2004

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 79th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - assault (against a PO)

Witness Officers: James Feola, Christop Pena, Ronald Stafford

Officer:	Rampershad, Rishiram
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Male, 25-29
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Male, 25-29
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 21-24
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Lanot, Paul
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Rampershad, Rishiram
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Mazzella, John
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Squibb, Michael
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Rampershad, Rishiram	Black Male, 25	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer	Black Male, 25-29	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Unknown Officer	Black Male, 25-29	Force: Physical force	Unfounded
Unknown Officer	Hispanic Male, 21-24	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Lanot, Paul	Black Male, 25	Force: Gun Pointed	Exonerated
Rampershad, Rishiram	Black Male, 25	Force: Gun Pointed	Exonerated
Mazzella, John	Black Male, 25	Force: Gun Pointed	Exonerated
Squibb, Michael	Black Male, 25	Force: Gun Pointed	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.