Complaint #200307724, August 2003

Incident: August 14, 2003
Received: October 2, 2003
Closed: October 1, 2004

Reason for contact: Other
Location: Police building
In NYPD 63rd Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Derek Andreone, Daniel Callow, James Murphy

Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Male, 18-20
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Male, 18-20
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Male, 18-20
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Male, 18-20
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer:	Martinez, Robert
Complainant:	Black Female, 39
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Male, 18-20
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Walas, Joseph
Complainant:	Black Male, 19
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Unknown Officer	Male, 18-20	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Officer(s) Unidentified
Unknown Officer	Male, 18-20	Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search	Officer(s) Unidentified
Unknown Officer	Black Male, 18-20	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unfounded
Unknown Officer	Black Male, 18-20	Force: Physical force	Officer(s) Unidentified
Martinez, Robert	Black Female, 39	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer	Black Male, 18-20	Force: Physical force	Unfounded
Walas, Joseph	Black Male, 19	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.