Complaint #200403477, April 2004

Incident: April 18, 2004
Received: April 19, 2004
Closed: November 1, 2004


Reason for contact: Other violation of VTL
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 30th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct
Officer: Mackenzie, Angus
Complainant: Black Male, 28
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Fox, Jonathan
Complainant: Black Male, 27
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Fox, Jonathan
Complainant: Black Male, 27
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Mackenzie, Angus
Complainant: Black Male, 28
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Mackenzie, Angus
Complainant: Black Male, 28
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Mackenzie, Angus Black Male, 28 Force: Chokehold Unsubstantiated
Fox, Jonathan Black Male, 27 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Substantiated (Charges)
Fox, Jonathan Black Male, 27 Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search Substantiated (Charges)
Mackenzie, Angus Black Male, 28 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Mackenzie, Angus Black Male, 28 Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search Substantiated (Charges)

Penalties

Fox, Jonathan
Instructions

Mackenzie, Angus
Instructions


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.