Complaint #200411955, November 2004

Incident: November 2, 2004
Received: December 2, 2004
Closed: November 10, 2005

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 122nd Precinct Staten Island
Outcome: Arrest - resisting arrest

Witness Officers: Tracy Laffey

Officer:	Chiusano, Michael
Complainant:	Black Female, 26
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Chiusano, Michael
Complainant:	Black Female, 26
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Buckley, Cornelius
Complainant:	Black Female, 26
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Chiusano, Michael
Complainant:	Black Female, 26
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Buckley, Cornelius
Complainant:	Black Female, 26
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Perez, Samuel
Complainant:	Black Female, 26
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Female, 25-29
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Chiusano, Michael	Black Female, 26	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Chiusano, Michael	Black Female, 26	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Buckley, Cornelius	Black Female, 26	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Chiusano, Michael	Black Female, 26	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Exonerated
Buckley, Cornelius	Black Female, 26	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search	Exonerated
Perez, Samuel	Black Female, 26	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search	Exonerated
Unknown Officer	Black Female, 25-29	Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched	Officer(s) Unidentified

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.