Complaint #200502030, February 2005

Incident: February 14, 2005
Received: February 22, 2005
Closed: February 10, 2006


Reason for contact: Report-domestic dispute
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 75th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Anthony Chow, Stephen Maher
Officer: Muro, Nicholas
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 27
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Howell, Michael
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 27
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Howell, Michael
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 27
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Howell, Michael
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 27
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Howell, Michael
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 27
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Muro, Nicholas
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 27
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Howell, Michael
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Muro, Nicholas Hispanic Male, 27 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Howell, Michael Hispanic Male, 27 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Howell, Michael Hispanic Male, 27 Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Unfounded
Howell, Michael Hispanic Male, 27 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Unfounded
Howell, Michael Hispanic Male, 27 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Unsubstantiated
Muro, Nicholas Hispanic Male, 27 Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Unfounded
Howell, Michael Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.