Complaint #200511692, September 2005

Incident: September 28, 2005
Received: September 29, 2005
Closed: November 29, 2006


Reason for contact: Regulatory inspection
Location: Commercial building
In NYPD 90th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Joseph Callahan, Joseph Strack
Officer: Gonzalez, Egidio
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Kee, Charles
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Gonzalez, Egidio
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Gomezpina, Maricela
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 43
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Gomezpina, Maricela
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 43
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Antonsen, Jeffrey
Complainant: Hispanic Male
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Antonsen, Jeffrey
Complainant: Hispanic Male
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Gonzalez, Egidio Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Unsubstantiated
Kee, Charles Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
Gonzalez, Egidio Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
Gomezpina, Maricela Hispanic Male, 43 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Unsubstantiated
Gomezpina, Maricela Hispanic Male, 43 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Antonsen, Jeffrey Hispanic Male Abuse of Authority: Frisk Unsubstantiated
Antonsen, Jeffrey Hispanic Male Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.