Maricela Gomezpina

Badge #2036, Hispanic Female
Former Detective Grade 3 at Vice Enforcement Brooklyn North
Also served at 77th Precinct
Service started December 1997, ended June 2010, Tax #920340

Complaints

4 Complaints
5 Allegations
0 Substantiated
2 Exonerated
1 Miscellaneous - Subject Resigned
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200511692, September 2005
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 43
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 43
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200500158, January 2005
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: White Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Miscellaneous - Subject Resigned
additional details

Complaint #200408743, September 2004
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 42
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #9901383, March 1999
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Complainant: Black Male, 16
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200511692, September 2005
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Hispanic Male, 43 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Hispanic Male, 43 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200500158, January 2005
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop White Male, 31 Miscellaneous - Subject Resigned
additional details
Complaint #200408743, September 2004
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 42 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #9901383, March 1999
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Black Male, 16 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.