Complaint #200601757,
February 6, 2006

Officer: Washington, James
Complainant: Black Male, 21
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Merrill, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 21
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Cerami, Charles
Complainant: Black Male, 21
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Bellamore, Carmine
Complainant: Black Male, 21
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Ohara, Terrence
Complainant: Black Male, 21
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Yeung, Kent
Complainant: Black Male, 21
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Ohara, Terrence
Complainant: Black Male, 21
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Washington, James
Complainant: Black Male, 21
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Washington, James Black Male, 21 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Exonerated
Unknown Officer Black Male, 21-24 Discourtesy: Word Unfounded
Merrill, Michael Black Male, 21 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Cerami, Charles Black Male, 21 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Bellamore, Carmine Black Male, 21 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Ohara, Terrence Black Male, 21 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Yeung, Kent Black Male, 21 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Ohara, Terrence Black Male, 21 Force: Pepper spray Exonerated
Washington, James Black Male, 21 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Unknown Officer Black Male, 21-24 Force: Physical force Officer(s) Unidentified

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Officer(s) Unidentified': Unable to identify the officers who committed the alleged misconduct
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusions.


Details

Incident: February 6, 2006
Received: February 9, 2006
Closed: November 29, 2006

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 103rd Precinct Queens
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime