Complaint #200605536, April 2006

Incident: April 29, 2006
Received: May 1, 2006
Closed: June 15, 2007


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 75th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Douglas Cohen, Mechelle King
Officer: Cusumano, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Cusumano, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Cusumano, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Weber, Adrian
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Weber, Adrian
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Weber, Adrian
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Bourne, Sekou
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Bourne, Sekou
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Bourne, Sekou
Complainant: Black Male, 20
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Bourne, Sekou
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Bourne, Sekou
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Francis, Matthew
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Jones, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Jones, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Jones, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Jones, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Cusumano, Michael Black Male, 33 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Cusumano, Michael Black Male, 33 Force: Pepper spray Exonerated
Cusumano, Michael Black Male, 33 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Weber, Adrian Black Male, 33 Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) Unsubstantiated
Weber, Adrian Black Male, 33 Force: Gun Pointed Exonerated
Weber, Adrian Black Male, 33 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Bourne, Sekou Black Male, 33 Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) Exonerated
Bourne, Sekou Black Male, 33 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Bourne, Sekou Black Male, 20 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Bourne, Sekou Black Male, 33 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Unsubstantiated
Bourne, Sekou Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Unsubstantiated
Francis, Matthew Black Male, 33 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Jones, Michael Black Male, 33 Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Exonerated
Jones, Michael Black Male, 33 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Jones, Michael Black Male, 33 Force: Pepper spray Exonerated
Jones, Michael Black Male, 33 Force: Chokehold Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Black Female, 30-34 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Black Male, 30-34 Discourtesy: Word Officer(s) Unidentified

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.