Complaint #200609416, July 2006

Incident: July 18, 2006
Received: July 19, 2006
Closed: August 9, 2007


Reason for contact: Report-dispute
Location: Residential building
In NYPD 71st Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - resisting arrest

Witness Officers: Eric Delman, Thomas Demark, John Hoder
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 15-17
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Pilnacek, Dolores
Complainant: Black Male, 17
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Scarcella, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 17
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Perez, Eric
Complainant: Black Male, 17
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Moschetto, Matthew
Complainant: Black Male, 17
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Blot, Denise
Complainant: Black Male, 17
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Cox, Kevin
Complainant: Black Male, 17
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Unknown Officer Black Male, 15-17 Offensive Language: Race Unfounded
Pilnacek, Dolores Black Male, 17 Force: Nonlethal restraining device Unsubstantiated
Scarcella, Michael Black Male, 17 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Perez, Eric Black Male, 17 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Moschetto, Matthew Black Male, 17 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Blot, Denise Black Male, 17 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Cox, Kevin Black Male, 17 Force: Physical force Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.