Complaint #200610393, August 2006

Incident: August 7, 2006
Received: August 8, 2006
Closed: April 24, 2007


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 72nd Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Christophe Harrington, Michael Lazzara, Jesse Melhus, Anibal Morales, William Perez, Sean Spencer
Officer: Friscia, Christopher
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Friscia, Christopher
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 20
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Keenan, Joseph
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 20
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Keenan, Joseph
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 18-20
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Friscia, Christopher
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 40
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Givner, Harold
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 20
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Friscia, Christopher Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
Friscia, Christopher Hispanic Male, 20 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Keenan, Joseph Hispanic Male, 20 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Keenan, Joseph Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
Unknown Officer Hispanic Male, 18-20 Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) Unfounded
Friscia, Christopher Hispanic Female, 40 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Givner, Harold Hispanic Male, 20 Force: Physical force Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.