Complaint #200616349, December 2006

Incident: December 7, 2006
Closed: July 17, 2007


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - auto
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 48th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Joseph Flores, Israel Sanchez
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
Allegation: Discourtesy: Gesture
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer: Alvarez, Miguel
Complainant: Black Male, 25
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Acevedo, Nelson
Complainant: Black Male, 25
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Alvarez, Miguel
Complainant: Black Male, 25
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Alvarez, Miguel
Complainant: Black Male, 25
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Agosta, Joseph
Complainant: Black Male, 25
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Alvarez, Miguel
Complainant: Black Male, 25
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Unknown Officer Black Male, 25-29 Discourtesy: Gesture Officer(s) Unidentified
Alvarez, Miguel Black Male, 25 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Acevedo, Nelson Black Male, 25 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Unsubstantiated
Alvarez, Miguel Black Male, 25 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Unsubstantiated
Alvarez, Miguel Black Male, 25 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Exonerated
Agosta, Joseph Black Male, 25 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Exonerated
Alvarez, Miguel Black Male, 25 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.