Complaint #200701307, August 2006

Incident: August 16, 2006
Received: January 29, 2007
Closed: November 1, 2007

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - bldg
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 75th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Jose Ortiz

Officer:	Silva, Renzo
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Silva, Renzo
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat to notify ACS
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Silva, Renzo
Complainant:	Hispanic Male
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Interdonati, Michael
Complainant:	Hispanic Female, 30
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Interdonati, Michael
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Interdonati, Michael
Complainant:	Hispanic Male
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Interdonati, Michael
Complainant:	Hispanic Female, 30
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Silva, Renzo		Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched	Exonerated
Silva, Renzo		Abuse of Authority: Threat to notify ACS	Unsubstantiated
Silva, Renzo	Hispanic Male	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop	Exonerated
Interdonati, Michael	Hispanic Female, 30	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Interdonati, Michael		Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched	Exonerated
Interdonati, Michael	Hispanic Male	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop	Exonerated
Interdonati, Michael	Hispanic Female, 30	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.