Complaint #200702689, February 2007

Incident: February 24, 2007
Closed: February 4, 2008


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - bldg
Location: Residential building
In NYPD 83rd Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Stephen Dimario, Martin Haber, Michael Harvey, Christopher Western
Officer: Lock, Wayne
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Lock, Wayne
Complainant: Hispanic Male
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Lock, Wayne
Complainant: Hispanic Male
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Lock, Wayne
Complainant: Hispanic Male
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Buglione, Michael
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Officer: Lock, Wayne
Complainant: Hispanic Male
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Lock, Wayne Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
Lock, Wayne Hispanic Male Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Lock, Wayne Hispanic Male Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Substantiated (Charges)
Lock, Wayne Hispanic Male Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Buglione, Michael Hispanic Male, 30 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Lock, Wayne Hispanic Male Abuse of Authority: Question Unsubstantiated

Penalty

Lock, Wayne
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.