Complaint #200709516, June 2007

Incident: June 29, 2007
Received: July 3, 2007
Closed: September 24, 2008

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 75th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - disorderly conduct

Officer:	Castillo, Francisco
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Castillo, Francisco
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Marte, Miguel
Complainant:	Black Male, 29
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Marte, Miguel
Complainant:	Black Male, 29
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Berrios, Dennis
Complainant:	Black Male, 29
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Berrios, Dennis
Complainant:	Black Male, 25
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Male, 25-29
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Castillo, Francisco	Black Male, 25	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Castillo, Francisco	Black Male, 25	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)	Exonerated
Marte, Miguel	Black Male, 29	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)	Exonerated
Marte, Miguel	Black Male, 29	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Unsubstantiated
Berrios, Dennis	Black Male, 29	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop	Exonerated
Berrios, Dennis	Black Male, 25	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer	Black Male, 25-29	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.