Complaint #200710463, July 2007

Incident: July 19, 2007
Received: July 21, 2007
Closed: June 18, 2008


Reason for contact: Other
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 10th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Craig Collopy, Luis Cotes, Timothy Dowling, Brian Risano
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: White Male, 25-29
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Kelly, Liam
Complainant: White Male, 26
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Mccormack, Karyn
Complainant: White Male, 26
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Santiago, Daniel
Complainant: White Male, 26
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Kelly, Liam
Complainant: White Male, 26
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Kelly, Liam
Complainant: White Male, 45
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Kelly, Liam
Complainant: White Male, 53
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Kelly, Liam
Complainant: White Male, 26
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Unknown Officer White Male, 25-29 Discourtesy: Word Unfounded
Kelly, Liam White Male, 26 Discourtesy: Word Unfounded
Mccormack, Karyn White Male, 26 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Santiago, Daniel White Male, 26 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Kelly, Liam White Male, 26 Abuse of Authority: Other Unsubstantiated
Kelly, Liam White Male, 45 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Unsubstantiated
Kelly, Liam White Male, 53 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Unfounded
Kelly, Liam White Male, 26 Force: Physical force Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.