Complaint #200711624, August 2007

Incident: August 8, 2007
Received: August 13, 2007
Closed: February 15, 2008


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - bldg
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 104th Precinct Queens
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Robert Anderson
Officer: Hawkins, Robert
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Watson, Christophe
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Hawkins, Robert
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Watson, Christophe
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Watson, Christophe
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to notify ACS
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Watson, Christophe
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Watson, Christophe
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 24
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Hawkins, Robert Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Unsubstantiated
Watson, Christophe Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
Hawkins, Robert Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn Unsubstantiated
Watson, Christophe Hispanic Female, 24 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unsubstantiated
Watson, Christophe Abuse of Authority: Threat to notify ACS Exonerated
Watson, Christophe Hispanic Female, 24 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Exonerated
Watson, Christophe Hispanic Female, 24 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.