Complaint #200800184, January 2008

Incident: January 4, 2008
Closed: April 30, 2009


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 75th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct

Witness Officers: Sean Coniker, Roberto Melendez, Luis Murria
Officer: Nathaniel, Jenica
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 20
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer: Moses, Latoya
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 19
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer: Peralta, Kelvin
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 19
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Peralta, Kelvin
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 19
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 18-20
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Nathaniel, Jenica Hispanic Male, 20 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Moses, Latoya Hispanic Male, 19 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Peralta, Kelvin Hispanic Male, 19 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Unsubstantiated
Peralta, Kelvin Hispanic Male, 19 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Hispanic Male, 18-20 Abuse of Authority: Question Exonerated

Penalties

Moses, Latoya
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty

Nathaniel, Jenica
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.