Complaint #200801290, January 2008

Incident: January 20, 2008
Received: January 25, 2008
Closed: April 30, 2009

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - auto
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 103rd Precinct Queens
Outcome: Arrest - resisting arrest

Witness Officers: Larry Brue, Jason Iorio, Richard Lamar, Thomas Lodico, Robert Miga, Thomas Obrien

Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Male, 35-39
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Complainant Unavailable
Officer:	Ho, Mingfang
Complainant:	Male, 39
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Sinnona, Christopher
Complainant:	Male, 39
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Kelly, Michael
Complainant:	Male, 39
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Male, 35-39
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Complainant Unavailable
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Male, 35-39
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Complainant Unavailable
Officer:	Ho, Mingfang
Complainant:	Male, 39
Allegation:	Force: Vehicle
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Unknown Officer	Male, 35-39	Force: Physical force	Complainant Unavailable
Ho, Mingfang	Male, 39	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Sinnona, Christopher	Male, 39	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Kelly, Michael	Male, 39	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer	Male, 35-39	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Complainant Unavailable
Unknown Officer	Male, 35-39	Discourtesy: Word	Complainant Unavailable
Ho, Mingfang	Male, 39	Force: Vehicle	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.