Complaint #200808431, June 2008

Incident: June 12, 2008
Closed: September 2, 2009

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 75th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Officer:	Bradlin, Jonathan
Complainant:	Black Male, 64
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Bradlin, Jonathan
Complainant:	Black Male, 64
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Bradlin, Jonathan
Complainant:	Black Male, 64
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Alicea, Isaias
Complainant:	Black Male, 64
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Alicea, Isaias
Complainant:	Black Male, 64
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Cabrera, Samantha
Complainant:	Black Male, 64
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Cabrera, Samantha
Complainant:	Black Male, 64
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Bradlin, Jonathan	Black Male, 64	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Unsubstantiated
Bradlin, Jonathan	Black Male, 64	Abuse of Authority: Stop	Exonerated
Bradlin, Jonathan	Black Male, 64	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unfounded
Alicea, Isaias	Black Male, 64	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Unsubstantiated
Alicea, Isaias	Black Male, 64	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Cabrera, Samantha	Black Male, 64	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Unsubstantiated
Cabrera, Samantha	Black Male, 64	Force: Physical force	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.