Complaint #200907056, May 2009

Incident: May 5, 2009
Received: May 7, 2009
Closed: June 7, 2010


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 46th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Harry Delacruz, Nelson Garcia, Rafael Perdomo
Officer: Camacho, Jose
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 40
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (No Recommendations)
Officer: Camacho, Jose
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 40
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Burgos, Ezequiel
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 40
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Burgos, Ezequiel
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 40
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (No Recommendations)
Officer: Camacho, Jose
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
CCRB Conclusion: Victim Unidentified
Officer: Camacho, Jose
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 40
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (No Recommendations)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Camacho, Jose Hispanic Male, 40 Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (No Recommendations)
Camacho, Jose Hispanic Male, 40 Force: Gun Pointed Unsubstantiated
Burgos, Ezequiel Hispanic Male, 40 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Unsubstantiated
Burgos, Ezequiel Hispanic Male, 40 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Substantiated (No Recommendations)
Camacho, Jose Abuse of Authority: Question Victim Unidentified
Camacho, Jose Hispanic Male, 40 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Substantiated (No Recommendations)

Penalties

Camacho, Jose
Command Discipline - B

Burgos, Ezequiel
Command Discipline - B


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.