Complaint #200910296, July 2009

Incident: July 6, 2009
Closed: August 30, 2010

Reason for contact: Report-dispute
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 106th Precinct Queens
Outcome: Arrest - OGA

Witness Officers: Jennifer Cittadino, Ivette Cresporoman, Otto Espinoza, Joseph Lamonica, Shelly Peralta, George Scott

Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Asian Male, 45-49
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Kelly, Liam
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Kelly, Liam
Complainant:	Male, 38
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Asian Male, 45-49
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Asian Female, 40-44
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Asian Male, 45-49
Allegation:	Offensive Language: Race
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Ruthizer, Tyler
Complainant:	Asian Male, 45
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Unknown Officer	Asian Male, 45-49	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Kelly, Liam		Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Kelly, Liam	Male, 38	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer	Asian Male, 45-49	Force: Physical force	Unfounded
Unknown Officer	Asian Female, 40-44	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Officer(s) Unidentified
Unknown Officer	Asian Male, 45-49	Offensive Language: Race	Unfounded
Ruthizer, Tyler	Asian Male, 45	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.