Complaint #201004858, April 2010

Incident: April 9, 2010
Received: April 13, 2010
Closed: September 27, 2010


Reason for contact: Execution of search warrant
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 40th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Stephen Burns, Danixon Cabrera, Anthony Disimone, Michael Dye, Loser Lane, William Murray
Officer: Valentin, Peter
Complainant: Black Male, 36
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to show search warrant
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Valentin, Peter
Complainant: Black Male, 36
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21-24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
Officer: Marchena, Carlos
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Valentin, Peter Black Male, 36 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to show search warrant Unsubstantiated
Valentin, Peter Black Male, 36 Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched Unfounded
Unknown Officer Black Male, 35-39 Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Unfounded
Unknown Officer Black Male, 35-39 Discourtesy: Word Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Unknown Officer Hispanic Male, 21-24 Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched Alleged Victim Unavailable
Marchena, Carlos Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.