Complaint #201005427, March 2010

Incident: March 16, 2010
Received: April 23, 2010
Closed: April 5, 2011

Reason for contact: Other
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 20th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Anthony Borelli, Dennis Cullen, Vincent Kong

Officer:	Unknown Officer
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Vega, Artemio
Complainant:	Black Female, 37
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Male, 30-34
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Vega, Artemio
Complainant:	Black Female, 37
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Edwards, Antonio
Complainant:	Black Female, 37
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Male, 30-34
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Male, 30-34
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Unknown Officer		Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched	Exonerated
Vega, Artemio	Black Female, 37	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Unknown Officer	Black Male, 30-34	Discourtesy: Word	Unfounded
Vega, Artemio	Black Female, 37	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Edwards, Antonio	Black Female, 37	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer	Black Male, 30-34	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unfounded
Unknown Officer	Black Male, 30-34	Force: Physical force	Unfounded

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.