Complaint #201011278, August 2010

Incident: August 14, 2010
Received: August 15, 2010
Closed: January 11, 2012

Reason for contact: Report-noise/disturbance
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 81st Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Katherine Trochez

Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Female
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Officer:	Goldstein, David
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Goldstein, David
Complainant:	Black Female, 37
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Blackmon, Boris
Complainant:	Black Female, 37
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Meyer, William
Complainant:	Black Female, 18
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Female
Allegation:	Force: Pepper spray
CCRB Conclusion:	Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Male, 45-49
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Alleged Victim Uncooperative

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Unknown Officer	Female	Force: Physical force	Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Goldstein, David		Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched	Exonerated
Goldstein, David	Black Female, 37	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Blackmon, Boris	Black Female, 37	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint	Unsubstantiated
Meyer, William	Black Female, 18	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer	Female	Force: Pepper spray	Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Unknown Officer	Black Male, 45-49	Discourtesy: Word	Alleged Victim Uncooperative

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.