Complaint #201011459, August 2010

Incident: August 17, 2010
Received: August 19, 2010
Closed: February 18, 2011


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 25th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - resisting arrest

Witness Officers: Damien Banks, Benjamin Bellingeri, Jorge Rodriguez
Officer: Rodriguez, Juan
Complainant: Black Male, 54
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Rodriguez, Juan Black Male, 54 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Unknown Officer Black Male, 50-54 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Black Male, 50-54 Force: Pepper spray Unfounded
Unknown Officer Black Male, 50-54 Force: Physical force Unfounded
Unknown Officer Black Male, 50-54 Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched Unfounded
Unknown Officer Black Male, 50-54 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Black Male, 50-54 Force: Physical force Unfounded

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.