Complaint #201016728, October 2010

Incident: October 9, 2010
Received: December 7, 2010
Closed: July 14, 2011


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 43rd Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime
Officer: Leitao, Anthony
Complainant: Black Female, 46
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Leitao, Anthony
Complainant: Black Female, 46
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Iglesias, Miguel
Complainant: Black Female, 46
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Iglesias, Miguel
Complainant: Black Male, 51
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Iglesias, Miguel
Complainant: Black Male, 51
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Iglesias, Miguel
Complainant: Black Female, 46
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Leitao, Anthony Black Female, 46 Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Charges)
Leitao, Anthony Black Female, 46 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Iglesias, Miguel Black Female, 46 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Unfounded
Iglesias, Miguel Black Male, 51 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Substantiated (Charges)
Iglesias, Miguel Black Male, 51 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Charges)
Iglesias, Miguel Black Female, 46 Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Charges)

Penalties

Iglesias, Miguel
Instructions

Leitao, Anthony
Instructions


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.