Complaint #201017343, December 2010

Incident: December 17, 2010
Received: December 22, 2010
Closed: October 21, 2011


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 44th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - resisting arrest

Witness Officers: Alan Avella, Jason Baker, Jonathan Rivera, Miguel Sanchez
Officer: Lyons, Joseph
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 20
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Lyons, Joseph
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 20
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Lyons, Joseph
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 20
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Lyons, Joseph
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 20
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Lyons, Joseph
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 20
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Lyons, Joseph
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 20
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Lyons, Joseph Hispanic Male, 20 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Lyons, Joseph Hispanic Male, 20 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Lyons, Joseph Hispanic Male, 20 Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched Unsubstantiated
Lyons, Joseph Hispanic Male, 20 Abuse of Authority: Stop Unsubstantiated
Lyons, Joseph Hispanic Male, 20 Force: Gun Pointed Exonerated
Lyons, Joseph Hispanic Male, 20 Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory arrest Substantiated (Charges)

Penalty

Lyons, Joseph
Instructions


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.