Complaint #201113585, October 2011

Incident: October 7, 2011
Received: October 18, 2011
Closed: February 13, 2013


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 24th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Charles Cavallaro
Officer: Pineda, Bryant
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 32
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Pineda, Bryant
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 32
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Male
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
Officer: Pineda, Bryant
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 32
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer: Dejesus, Raymond
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 32
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Pineda, Bryant Hispanic Male, 32 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Unsubstantiated
Pineda, Bryant Hispanic Male, 32 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Male Abuse of Authority: Frisk Alleged Victim Unavailable
Pineda, Bryant Hispanic Male, 32 Abuse of Authority: Question Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Dejesus, Raymond Hispanic Male, 32 Abuse of Authority: Question Substantiated (Command Discipline)

Penalties

Dejesus, Raymond
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty

Pineda, Bryant
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.