Complaint #201202587, February 2012

Incident: February 24, 2012
Received: February 27, 2012
Closed: July 10, 2013


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD Midtown South Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued
Officer: Duke, Travis
Complainant: Black Male, 53
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer: Duke, Travis
Complainant: Black Male, 53
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Estupinan, Richard
Complainant: Black Male, 53
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Duke, Travis
Complainant: Black Male, 53
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Duke, Travis Black Male, 53 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Duke, Travis Black Male, 53 Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Unsubstantiated
Estupinan, Richard Black Male, 53 Abuse of Authority: Stop Exonerated
Duke, Travis Black Male, 53 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Exonerated

Penalty

Duke, Travis
Instructions


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.