Complaint #201202777, February 2012

Incident: February 14, 2012
Received: March 2, 2012
Closed: May 22, 2013


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - bldg
Location: Residential building
In NYPD 90th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Summons - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Apostolos Masouridis
Officer: Antonelli, Matthew
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 37
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
NYPD Disposition: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Officer: Antonelli, Matthew
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 37
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Antonelli, Matthew
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 37
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
NYPD Disposition: Instructions
Officer: Dimambro, Michael
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 37
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer: Crowley, Liam
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 37
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Antonelli, Matthew Hispanic Male, 37 Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Command Discipline)
NYPD Disposition: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Antonelli, Matthew Hispanic Male, 37 Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Unsubstantiated
Antonelli, Matthew Hispanic Male, 37 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Command Discipline)
NYPD Disposition: Instructions
Dimambro, Michael Hispanic Male, 37 Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Crowley, Liam Hispanic Male, 37 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated

Penalties

Antonelli, Matthew
Instructions

Dimambro, Michael
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Command Discipline - B


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.