Complaint #201203661, March 2012

Incident: March 20, 2012
Received: March 21, 2012
Closed: April 23, 2013

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 101st Precinct Queens
Outcome: Arrest - disorderly conduct

Officer:	Ham, Woo
Complainant:	Black Male, 19
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Ham, Woo
Complainant:	Black Male, 19
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Ham, Woo
Complainant:	Black Male, 19
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Wall, Timothy
Complainant:	Black Male, 19
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Ham, Woo	Black Male, 19	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Ham, Woo	Black Male, 19	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Ham, Woo	Black Male, 19	Abuse of Authority: Stop	Exonerated
Wall, Timothy	Black Male, 19	Abuse of Authority: Stop	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.