Complaint #201209710, July 2012

Incident: July 6, 2012
Received: July 29, 2012
Closed: June 6, 2013


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Park
In NYPD 42nd Precinct Bronx
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued
Officer: Rojas, William
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Rojas, William
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Kreppel, Robyn
Complainant: Black Male, 22
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Kreppel, Robyn
Complainant: Black Male, 22
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Kreppel, Robyn
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Rojas, William
Complainant: Black Male, 33
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Rojas, William Black Male, 33 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Charges)
Rojas, William Black Male, 33 Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Charges)
Kreppel, Robyn Black Male, 22 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Kreppel, Robyn Black Male, 22 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Charges)
Kreppel, Robyn Black Male, 33 Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Charges)
Rojas, William Black Male, 33 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated

Penalties

Kreppel, Robyn
Forfeit vacation 3 days
Closed: Plea set aside, Without discipline, August 2014
APU Dismissed
No penalty

Rojas, William
Forfeit vacation 3 days
Closed: Plea set aside, Without discipline, August 2014
APU Dismissed
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.