Robyn L. Kreppel

Badge #2406, White Female
Former Police Officer at 43rd Precinct
Also served at Detective Borough Manhattan North, Patrol Borough Bronx Impact Response Team, 42nd Precinct
Service started July 2008, ended August 2023, Tax #947140
Other names: Robyn L. Holshek

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Stop

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2015-14243
Closed: 9/2/2015
Case: 2015-14231
Closed: 9/1/2015

View Details

Articles

Internal documents shed light on police discipline as NYPD faces criticism over secrecy behind penalties given to cops, New York Daily News, 3/13/2018

Complaints

3 Complaints
5 Allegations
2 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Complaint Withdrawn
1 Exonerated
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202006904, October 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201209710, July 2012
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Plea set aside, Without discipline, August 2014
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #201009409, July 2010
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 19
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202006904, October 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 35-39 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201209710, July 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 22 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 22 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 33 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Plea set aside, Without discipline, August 2014
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #201009409, July 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 19 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2015-14243
Closed: 9/2/2015
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While on-duty, ordered / directed a person known to the Department to reclassify a complaint report from Grand Larceny to Lost Property.
  2. Guilty: While on-duty, caused false and or inaccurate entries to be made in a Department record.
Penalty: Dismissal probation (12 months), suspended w/o pay (30 days), vacation days (30 days)

Case: 2015-14231
Closed: 9/1/2015
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Failed to perform duties as the Patrol Supervisor.
  2. Guilty: Failed to notify Internal Affairs bureu after learning about an allegation of misconduct made against another member of the service, as required.
  3. Guilty: Made false or misleading statements during an official Department interview.
Penalty: Dismissal probation (12 months), suspended w/o pay (30 days), vacation days (30 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 5 known lawsuits.

Harris, Tracy vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 301437/2014, Supreme Court - Bronx, June 18, 2014, ended November 17, 2015
Zero Disposition
Summons/Complaint

Townsend, Kareem et Al vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 023596/2013E, Supreme Court - Bronx, January 2, 2014
Complaint

Persuad, Sarabjeet v. City of New York et al
Case # 303266/2010, Supreme Court - Bronx
Complaint

Watson v. City of New York et al
Case # 308648/2012, Supreme Court - Bronx
Summons/Complaint

Gomez v. The City Of New York, et al
Case # 15CV07524, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY
Original Complaint, Amended Complaint
Description: Plaintiff alleges on March 22, 2014, while employed as an uniformed police officer with the Police Department City of New York he was assaulted by another uniformed police officer who intentionally discharged OC Spray into his eyes. Plaintiff alleges the assault was covered up by police supervisors, other police personnel, NYC Patrolman Benevolent Association (PBA) and Sergeants' Benevolent Association (SBA) Delegates, EMS personnel and hospital personnel.