Complaint #201211599, August 2012

Incident: August 31, 2012
Received: September 6, 2012
Closed: December 30, 2013


Reason for contact: Report-gun possession/shots fired
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 73rd Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - assault (against a PO)
Officer: Shreve, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 32
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Shreve, Michael
Complainant: Black Male, 32
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Gilhuys, Delon
Complainant: Black Male, 32
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Gilhuys, Delon
Complainant: Black Male
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Rupram, Suresh
Complainant: Black Male, 32
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Dyce, Leonard
Complainant: Black Male, 32
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Gilhuys, Delon
Complainant: Black Male
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
Officer: Gilhuys, Delon
Complainant: Black Male, 32
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Shreve, Michael Black Male, 32 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Shreve, Michael Black Male, 32 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Gilhuys, Delon Black Male, 32 Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) Exonerated
Gilhuys, Delon Black Male Abuse of Authority: Frisk Exonerated
Rupram, Suresh Black Male, 32 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Dyce, Leonard Black Male, 32 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Gilhuys, Delon Black Male Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Alleged Victim Unavailable
Gilhuys, Delon Black Male, 32 Force: Physical force Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.