Complaint #201305628, June 2013

Incident: June 21, 2013
Received: June 24, 2013
Closed: April 21, 2014


Reason for contact: C/V intervened on behalf of/observed encounter w/3rd party
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 40th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Steven Colon, Joseph Sans
Officer: Simms, Robert
Complainant: Male, 24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Simms, Robert
Complainant: Male, 24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Simms, Robert
Complainant: Male, 24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Simms, Robert
Complainant: Male, 24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Simms, Robert Male, 24 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Substantiated (Charges)
Simms, Robert Male, 24 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unsubstantiated
Simms, Robert Male, 24 Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Substantiated (Charges)
Simms, Robert Male, 24 Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Charges)

Penalty

Simms, Robert
Forfeit vacation 6 days
Closed: Resolved by plea, January 2016
APU Guilty
Forfeit vacation 6 days


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.