Complaint #201306080, July 2013

Incident: July 4, 2013
Received: July 9, 2013
Closed: August 7, 2014


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - bldg
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 81st Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - OGA

Witness Officers: Thomas Hunter, Conrad Narcisse, Lakeisha Smith
Officer: Garner, Ross
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Treuman, Malerie
Complainant: Black Male, 26
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Hirsch, Forrest
Complainant: Black Male, 26
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Disposition: APU Not guilty
Officer: Passolo, Thomas
Complainant: Black Female, 41
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Passolo, Thomas
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Thomas, Jonathan
Complainant: Black Male, 26
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Hirsch, Forrest
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Disposition: APU Guilty
Officer: Thomas, Jonathan
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Abbassi, Isa
Complainant: Black Female, 41
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Abbassi, Isa
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Thomas, Jonathan
Complainant: Black Male, 26
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Abbassi, Isa
Complainant: Black Female, 41
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Sitzman, William
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Garner, Ross Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Substantiated (Charges)
Treuman, Malerie Black Male, 26 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Hirsch, Forrest Black Male, 26 Offensive Language: Race Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Disposition: APU Not guilty
Passolo, Thomas Black Female, 41 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Substantiated (Charges)
Passolo, Thomas Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Substantiated (Charges)
Thomas, Jonathan Black Male, 26 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Hirsch, Forrest Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Disposition: APU Guilty
Thomas, Jonathan Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Unsubstantiated
Abbassi, Isa Black Female, 41 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Substantiated (Charges)
Abbassi, Isa Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Substantiated (Charges)
Thomas, Jonathan Black Male, 26 Force: Physical force Exonerated
Abbassi, Isa Black Female, 41 Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Unsubstantiated
Sitzman, William Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Substantiated (Charges)

Penalties

Abbassi, Isa
Closed: Not guilty after trial, May 2016
APU Not guilty

Passolo, Thomas
Closed: Not guilty after trial, May 2016
APU Not guilty

Sitzman, William
Closed: Guilty after trial, May 2016
APU Guilty
Forfeit vacation 3 days

Hirsch, Forrest
Closed: Guilty after trial, May 2016
Forfeit vacation 5 days

Garner, Ross
Closed: Guilty after trial, May 2016
APU Guilty
Forfeit vacation 3 days


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.