Conrad A. Narcisse

Conrad A. Narcisse

Conrad A. Narcisse
Badge #7317, Black Male
Detective Grade 2 at 81st Precinct since July 2026
Also served at FIFA World Cup, Medical Division, Patrol Borough Brooklyn North Impact Response Team, Patrol Borough Brooklyn North Community Affairs Section
Service started January 2009, made $178,000 last year, Tax #948103

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera

Lawsuit Settlements:
$17,500   Davis, Kent vs City of New York, et al., 2014 EDNY EDNY 14CV01699
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
9 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
3 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202405038, May 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #202007501, November 2020
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201506399, July 2015
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 34
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201010364, July 2010
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
Complainant: Black Female, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202405038, May 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Female, 15-17 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Force: Physical force Black Female, 15-17 Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #202007501, November 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 45-49 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 40-44 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201506399, July 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 36 Exonerated
Force: Physical force Black Female, 34 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201010364, July 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn Complainant Uncooperative
Offensive Language: Race Black Female, 33 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $17,500 total settlements.

Edwards, Marcus vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 511771/2020, Supreme Court - Kings, July 23, 2020, ended December 11, 2025
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On September 8, 2017 at approximately 5:00pm at or near the premises of 120 Chauncey Street, Brooklyn, New York, in the County of Kings, City and State of New York, the plaintiff, Marcus Edwards was arrested by defendant NYC's police officers, including defendants Conrad Narcisse and NYPD Officer Facey. Mr. Edwards was unlawfully and illegally physically seized, arrested, and imprisoned by the defendants , who placed him in handcuffs and placed him in a cell even though the defendants did not have an arrest warrant, reasonable suspicion or probable cause. Defendants used excessive force in arresting Mr. Edwards. Defendants thereafter maliciously prosecuted Mr. Edwards by wrongfully complaining, commencing and/...

Davis, Kent vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 14CV01699, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, March 20, 2014, ended June 24, 2014
$17,500 Settlement
Amended Complaint, Complaint, Stipulation
Description: On September 23, 2013, Kent Davis was unlawfully detained, searched, arrested, and prosecuted on the false charge of attempted tampering with physical evidence. Mr. Davis regularly played chess in Fulton Park and had recently completed a game of chess when the defendants entered the park. After one of the officers falsely claimed Mr. Davis had marijuana, he was detained, questioned, searched and arrested, on the false claim that he had destroyed marijuana. At the 81st Precinct Stationhouse, defendant Hirsch, prepared or allowed to be prepared false police reports accusing Mr. Davis of attempted tampering with evidence. While at the Stationhouse, one or more of the defendants caused Mr. Davis to be strip-searche...

Other Documents