Complaint #201308666, September 2013

Incident: September 15, 2013
Received: September 17, 2013
Closed: December 22, 2014

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - bldg
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 113th Precinct Queens
Outcome: Summons - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Anthony Canale, Christopher Ward

Officer:	Lovelock, Charles
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Scafa, Vincent
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Lewis, Mark
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Lewis, Mark
Complainant:	Black Male, 40
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Lovelock, Charles
Complainant:	Black Male, 40
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Dammacco, John
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Castillogonzalez, Rebecca
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Lovelock, Charles		Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched	Exonerated
Scafa, Vincent		Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched	Exonerated
Lewis, Mark		Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched	Exonerated
Lewis, Mark	Black Male, 40	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Unfounded
Lovelock, Charles	Black Male, 40	Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property	Unsubstantiated
Dammacco, John		Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched	Exonerated
Castillogonzalez, Rebecca		Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.