Complaint from October 1, 2013

Case number 201309377
Incident: October 1, 2013
Received: October 7, 2013
Closed: November 5, 2014

Witness Officers: Aida Acevedo, Anthony Avosso, Cluver Cotrina, Argimiro Goicoechea, Keith Santiago, Moyibi Thomas
Reason for contact: C/V requested investigation of crime
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 60th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Officer:	Oneill, Patrick White Male
Complainant:	White Male, 41
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Oneill, Patrick White Male
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer:	Oneill, Patrick White Male
Complainant:	White Male, 41
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer:	Kovalik, Michael White Male
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	White Male, 40-44
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Oneill, Patrick White Male	White Male, 41	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Oneill, Patrick White Male		Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Oneill, Patrick White Male	White Male, 41	Abuse of Authority: Property damaged	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Kovalik, Michael White Male		Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Unknown Officer	White Male, 40-44	Force: Physical force	Officer(s) Unidentified

Penalties

Oneill, Patrick

Penalty: Command Discipline - A

Kovalik, Michael

Penalty: Command Discipline - A

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.